Favorite 2012 Astronomy Images

Phil Plait at Slate has picked “The Best Astronomy Images of 2012”. He narrowed it down to his favorite 21. They are all good; here I’ve copied my favorite four. See the Slate article for more complete descriptions, and the other 17 images.

Huge Solar Arch – On August 31, 2012, a big arch of material blasted off the Sun’s surface. By “big” we mean 200,000 miles (300,000 km) across, which is 25 times the diameter of the Earth. More such emanations are expected as the Sun’s magnetic cycle peaks in coming months.

Slate_2012_Sun Arch -largeNASA/GSFC/SDO.

Self-Portrait of “Curiosity” Mars Rover

Slate_2012_Mars Rover -large NASA/JPL-Caltech/Malin Space Science Systems.

Twin Jets From Black Hole Disk – – A large black hole, with 2.5 billion times the mass of the Sun, lies in the heart of galaxy Hercules A.  Nearby material falls into it and gets ripped apart and sucked into the black hole. On its way in, this material forms a superheated disk where some of it expands violently. Various forces focus this expanding material into two jets that shoot out for hundreds of thousands of light years before they slow down and puff into twin lobes of matter.

Slate_2012_Hercules twin jets -largeNASA, ESA, S. Baum and C. O’Dea (RIT), R. Perley and W. Cotton (NRAO/AUI/NSF), and the Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA).

Deep Field of Galaxies- – This is an image assembled from photos by the Hubble space telescope totaling 23 days of exposure. The target area  (“Hubble Extreme Deep Field”) is a region of the sky that seems to be empty, according to normal observation. But this long exposure by Hubble’s eagle eye detects thousands of objects here. Nearly every object in this shot is actually a galaxy, each containing billions of stars. Extrapolation from this image indicates that there are hundreds of billions of such galaxies in the Universe, most of them billions of light-years away.

Slate_2012_Deep Field 13 Bill yrs -largeNASA, ESA, G. Illingworth, D. Magee, and P. Oesch (University of California, Santa Cruz), R. Bouwens (Leiden University), and the HUDF09 Team.

As a follow-up, this article  zooms into the photo above, and identifies several galaxies that are around 13 billion years old. For one of these galaxies, estimated at 13.3 billion years old, we are seeing light from something that dates to only about 400 million years after the Big Bang itself.


About ScottBuchanan

Ph D chemical engineer, interested in intersection of science with my evangelical Christian faith. This intersection includes creation(ism) and miracles. I also write on random topics of interest, such as economics, folding scooters, and composting toilets. Background: B.A. in Near Eastern Studies, a year at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary and a year working as a plumber and a lab technician. Then a B.S.E. and a Ph.D. in chemical engineering. Since then, conducted research in an industrial laboratory. Published a number of papers on heterogeneous catalysis, and an inventor on over 80 U.S. patents in diverse technical areas.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Favorite 2012 Astronomy Images

  1. I didn’t know about these! Incredible!

  2. Allen Johnson says:

    Explore the Galaxy in Glorious 3D from your PC …to boldly go where no man has gone before!
    Now you can get lost in space, fly anywhere in virtual space, at any speed, in any direction and at any time in history
    A real-time, three-dimensional view of our solar system, the galaxy and the universe.
    You ever looked up into the night sky and really wondered about where we fit into it all? Asked yourself what’s out there? How far does it go? What do the other planets and stars look like close up? What exactly do the space stations look like? How far does the universe extend? Where did we come from and where are we going?
    I bet you have. We all have. Click here to get more information

  3. ashley haworth-roberts says:

    Scott Buchanan

    Please see THIS:
    It responds to THIS:

    Sanford’s slightly pompous article – only skimmed as I’m no geneticist – asks you to apologise and to “append this response to” your blog attack.

    You might of course wish to do more than append his response…

    Ashley Haworth-Roberts

    • Ashley,
      I do appreciate your letting me know about this. It may do little good, but I will post a brief response and provide a link back to Dr. Sanford’s post. Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s